I'll do my best to honor the restrictions on this story. Here's the caveat: "This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed." Pretty heavy restrictions, no. Now, I don't think you can copyright a headline, so I'm going to lead with it:
Woman Accused Of Spitting On Deputy
44-Year-Old Hurled Death Threats, Racial Slurs, Officials Say
Tantalizing stuff wouldn't you say. Go here to read the entire story, and please return to discuss it with me. I thought long and hard about an appropriate angle from which to present this story. The story is unusual primarily because of the racial angle, and the attempt at power usurpation, using a familiar nemesis of blacks, the dreaded, and feared KKK. At least, those are the emotions the woman hoped the very mentioning of the Ku Klux Klan would evoke for this black officer.
Apparently, it didn't work. She's in jail, with a hefty bail around her neck, and monetary leg irons in the amount of thousands of dollars restricting her movements. In short, she's not going anywhere, anytime, soon, unless her KKK father is one of those big bonus-receiving CEO's on Wall Street.
Okay, let's get the preliminaries out the way. The woman may be suffering from a mental illness, and missed her mandatory meds that's keeping her mentally balanced. Mental illness is not a subject I treat lightly. I've known several people over the years who have struggled with schizophrenia, and, without regular medical intervention, or treatment, could spend days, even weeks doing some rather bizarre things.
And her father could be an Imperial Wizard of the KKK. That would go a long way toward understanding the outrage she felt when ticketed by the black officer, and ultimately arrested by him. I suspect that it's the former, though, but one can never be sure. More information will have to come to light in the days ahead, before we can fully know the reason for her bizarre behavior.
But give this some thought: What if this caught on? The use of intimidation to stop blacks from acting, whether as officers of the law, or as potential candidates for local, state, or federal office.
How many blacks are now eager to run for the presidency witnessing the threats against President Obama and his family? Could this be one of the Republican's schemes: To discourage another black from seeking this nation's highest office again, unless he's Republican? Or to discourage President Obama from seeking a second term?
Colin Powell was this nation's first star-quality black to be considered a shoe-in for president. If not a sure bet, at least a candidate with a real chance: Both blacks and whites had mad respect for Powell (at least for a time). Black democrats would have embraced him, unlike many black Republicans, who attack President Obama with as much gusto, or more so, as any white Republican. Of course, they trumpet their reasons: He's for abortion; He's an empty suit (whatever than mean); He's the wrong black at the wrong time (He'll fail so miserably at the job, that a really qualified black, in the future, won't even be considered.) This call for a black presidential candidate to have the qualifications of God before he or she can run for this nation's highest office, is a little perplexing to me.
But it is part and parcel of the black American experience, and part of the pathology that says we've got to be better in every category to be taken seriously by whites, and, if we fail, we give them more ammunition to level against us, if and when we try again.
One writer sees it this way:
"It should be remembered that thirty years ago the mere suggestion of a black candidate running for the presidency would have made liberals wistful, moderates edgy, and conservatives heatedly indignant. Besides, the probability of a black president living out his term of office was as remote a possibility as a man walking from the earth to Pluto. It seems pragmatic to think that, under such glaring political and media scrutiny, every decision Powell made would be called into question. The president would spend more time defending old positions than creating new ones, as the sad case of former New York City Mayor David Dinkins immediately brings to mind. Perhaps Powell wanted to avoid such a fate, and who could blame him?"
This writer's assessment would be more true for President Obama, than for a President Powell. I don't believe that Powell would have met a similar fate: No Birthers, Tea Baggers (I understand Republicans find the term offensive, hence, the use), or health care reform, or verbally explosive Town Hall meetings, or gun-toting loonies, Hitler references, or "I want my country back" sad cases. And if Powell had been controversial in some way, Democrats wouldn't have attacked him with the same vitriol with which President Obama has been attacked, nor would his life be threatened to the same extent. Sure there would be some white supremacists who might attempt something, but that wouldn't be because of his politics, so much as for his race and his color.
Julie Hubbard, if a Republican, might have accepted Powell as president, but I'm thinking not. She was too quick to threaten the black officer with the vengeance of the KKK. And let's not forget all of the other things she did: cursed him, spat on him, and urinated in his squad car. This does not sound like a woman who would accept any black man as president, whether Republican or Democrat.
This is America, after all, and I'm always reversing these incidents. Many blacks do it. I'm no exception. I think I may blog about this one day, to examine why we do it. We're often called out for it. But that's too bad. We didn't create the propensity. It was foisted on us by too many white on black situations that left us scratching our collective heads: "What if the woman had been black, and she cursed a white officer, threatened him, used racial epithets, spat on him, and urinated in his squad car?"
I wonder if the parrot found in the back seat of Hubbard's car can be called as a witness? And if called, would he spill the beans, or should I say, the bird seeds?
12 years ago
9 comments:
this is a toss up, the woman could be the daughter of the kkk, or she could be mentally ill, but my best bet is that she is both, since kkk is extreme mental illness. actually whiteness, (notice i didn't say white people) is a mental illness, much like an addiction, white people who suffer from whiteness syndrome, are blind, unable to see, and in deep denial.
there is no doubt that if this woman was Black, she probably be either tased, dead, missing, or spending the rest of her life in prison.
You're right, Kathy, "whiteness" can be an illness. And I like the term, "Whiteness Syndrome." I must remember to use it some time.
Our world is so culturally, and racially rich, that it boggles the mind that one group would choose to stand out by insisting on its superiority.
I agree: Matrice Richardson is still missing, and her last known location was a Sheriff substation.
Not saying they had anything to do with her disappearance, but they would have treated a lost, and helpless dog better than they treated her.
Black Diaspora, I wrote a post about Mitrice at the DKos, it got about three comments, one of which accused me of libel, I took the post down.
I still have a lot of questions, like, where the heck are the video tapes of her leaving the police station, also, I found a link about a complaint made by a movie director who says he was mistreated by Lost Hills police when they picked up his fifteen year old son, and his son thought they were going to kidnapp him, he was really scared.
I can't take credit for "whiteness syndrome" completely, since Kai, at Zuky, writes about whiteness quite a bit in his blog, you and Kai both have beautiful, gorgeous posts, I think you will like him. His post on the cartoon of the Obama's in the New Yorker is a must read, it is really the best analysis of it out there. The White Liberal Conundrum is also outstanding.
Kathy, thanks for your introduction to Kai at Zuky. I find in him a kindred soul. I will search for, and read, his post on the Obama New Yorker cartoon.
From what I've read of his writing so far, I think I'm in for a treat.
Also, I'll take a look at "White Liberal Conundrum." The title, itself, is intriguing.
What's with that Lost Hill substation? It sounds like something out of a bad 'B' movie. What comes to mind is the movie, From Dusk to Dawn. You go into this saloon, but, once there, your chances of leaving get slimmer by the minute.
Continue to share with me sites/blogs that you find interesting. It's hard to find the good ones on your own: Too many to choose from, and they don't always come with recommendations, or ratings.
Black Diaspora, I thought you would like Zuky! Too bad he doesn't post very often, but I enjoy reading his old posts, great writing and always food for thought, just like you!
The Lost Hills, yes, sounds like a bad b movie. She just disappeared and they don't care!
She looks about right for a poster child of the wingnut lunatic fringe.
It is quite simply fascinating to watch these people self-destruct. There is a pathology at work here, where this seems to be a version of the "Ghost Dancing" movement that swept Native American populations in the latter half of the 19th century or the suicidal cattle killing demise of the Xhosa of South Africa. Or maybe even Jonestown. People feeling marginalized and pushed to the edge, feeling their whole world straining under an impending sense of doom. The important difference here of course is that the Lakota and the Xhosa actually were very much in the process of having their way of life doomed. These creepy conservatives are only imagining their sense of divinely-given entitlement being under fire by the mere presence of a non-white president.
It's even more amazing that the Republican Party/Fox News has hitched their star to the out and out craziness of Bachmann and Beck. Then again, maybe it's not...since appealing to racist crazies is the one reliable thing they have to fall back on. What else do they have? Certainly not any ideas on how to govern.
What in the world is with these folks going around spitting on people. I mean that is one the most degrading and humiliating insult you could do towards another human being.
Ernesto I agree with you about Bachmann and Beck. Neither are worth two dead flies and are dangerous people. It might not seem like it and people dismiss their antics but they are not good for this country at all because some people take them serious. That's not a good thing.
@Ernesto: "[A]ppealing to racist crazies is the one reliable thing they have to fall back on. What else do they have? Certainly not any ideas on how to govern."
Ernesto, you always have a great deal to add to the conversation.
For eight years the Repubs pretty much had their way, and you know the result: two wars, a weak economy, and a loss of national prestige.
You'd think they'd be a bit repentant. But, no, they destroyed their party, and now they want to destroy the country.
Health care reform, sort of, has cleared one hurdle, but another is just a senate away.
What did we get, one, maybe two, Republican votes? We'll do good to get one in the senate.
Although my representative voted against it, she's taking a big gamble: her district went for Obama. Now, I don't see her serving another term. It was more important for her to be seen holding hands with fellow Repubs, than to be reelected.
@Granny: "[S]ome people take them serious. That's not a good thing."
I think many of them already have blood on their hand. Words have consequences: they galvanize people to behave well or badly.
Post a Comment